top of page

Navigating Engineering Plastics: A Deep Dive into POM's Strengths and Weaknesses in Comparison

In the intricate landscape of engineering plastics, the choice of material can significantly impact the success of a project. Polyoxymethylene, commonly known as POM, has earned its stripes as a reliable and versatile engineering plastic. Let's embark on a journey to compare POM to other prominent engineering plastics, exploring their strengths and weaknesses to guide you in making informed material choices for your applications.

POM weak to UV Radiation
UV Radiation

Polyoxymethylene (POM): An Overview


Mechanical Strength:

POM boasts impressive mechanical strength, making it a preferred choice for applications demanding robust materials. Its high tensile strength and stiffness contribute to its reliability in various engineering scenarios.

Low Friction and Wear Resistance:

POM's low friction coefficient is a standout feature, making it suitable for applications involving moving parts. Its inherent wear resistance ensures longevity and minimal maintenance requirements.

Dimensional Stability:

POM exhibits excellent dimensional stability, maintaining its shape and size even in fluctuating temperature conditions. This property is critical for applications requiring precise tolerances.

Chemical Resistance:

POM demonstrates resistance to various chemicals, including solvents and fuels. This chemical inertness expands its applications in industries where exposure to aggressive substances is commonplace.


UV Sensitivity:

POM is sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which can lead to degradation when exposed to prolonged sunlight. This limitation makes it less suitable for outdoor applications without UV stabilization.

Processing Challenges:

POM's high melting point and relatively slow crystallization rate can pose challenges during processing. Injection molding requires careful control of temperature and pressure to achieve optimal results.

Polycarbonate materials in our world
Polycarbonate materials


Comparative Analysis: POM vs. Other Engineering Plastics

1. POM vs. Nylon:

POM Strengths:

Higher stiffness and tensile strength than most nylon variants.

Lower moisture absorption, maintaining dimensional stability.

POM Weaknesses:

UV sensitivity, limiting outdoor applications.

Higher processing temperature requirements.

Nylon Strengths:

Greater impact resistance and flexibility.

Better performance in high-moisture environments.

Nylon Weaknesses:

Lower stiffness compared to POM.

Higher moisture absorption can affect dimensional stability.

2. POM vs. Acetal (Delrin):

POM Strengths:

Slightly higher tensile strength.

Lower moisture absorption.

POM Weaknesses:

UV sensitivity.

Processing challenges.

Acetal Strengths:

Excellent machinability.

Lower coefficient of friction.

Acetal Weaknesses:

Lower impact resistance compared to POM.

More susceptible to environmental stress cracking.

**3. POM vs. Polycarbonate:

POM Strengths:

Higher stiffness.

Better chemical resistance.

POM Weaknesses:

UV sensitivity.

Limited transparency compared to polycarbonate.

Polycarbonate Strengths:

Exceptional transparency.

Higher impact resistance.

Polycarbonate Weaknesses:

Lower stiffness than POM.

Sensitive to certain chemicals.

Selecting the Right Engineering Plastic: Considerations and Applications

1. Mechanical Requirements:

For applications demanding high mechanical strength and stiffness, POM may be preferable. Consider impact resistance and flexibility requirements when comparing with other plastics.

2. Environmental Exposure:

In outdoor applications, where exposure to UV radiation is a concern, alternative materials like UV-stabilized plastics or those with inherent UV resistance might be more suitable.

3. Moisture Conditions:

In high-moisture environments, nylon or other plastics with lower moisture absorption might be a better fit. POM's lower moisture absorption makes it advantageous in applications requiring dimensional stability.

4. Processing Considerations:

Evaluate the processing conditions and requirements. While POM may offer excellent performance, consider factors like processing temperature, ease of molding, and machinability.

Conclusion: POM in the Engineering Symphony

In the orchestra of engineering plastics, POM plays a distinct and powerful note. Its mechanical prowess, low friction, and chemical resistance make it a formidable contender for various applications. However, understanding its limitations, especially in the context of UV sensitivity, is crucial for informed material selection.

As you navigate the complex terrain of engineering material choices, consider the unique requirements of your project. Whether it's the high-stakes world of precision machinery or the demanding environments of automotive components, POM stands ready to contribute its strengths to the symphony of engineering innovation.

WhatsApp symbol
bottom of page